WINDOWS AND LINUX

Girls and Windows

o Both have a great UI.
o Both consume large resources and do less work.
o Both crash unexpectedly.
o Both are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
o Both can't work on low resource architectures (environment)
o Both are costly to maintain.
o Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
o Both's working often contradicts with their documentation.
o Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
o In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked

Boys and Linux

+ Both have an average UI.
+ Both are robust.
+ Both are highly secure.
+ Both can be easily modified to support new
concepts/features.
+ Both are highly efficient.
+ Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment)
no matter how low are resources.
+ You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux
just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by natureJ).
+ Both provide large support for development (work
environment).
+ Both are poorly documented